For those of us who can't actually remember how to get to work, tell where we are in a city, or even go to the grocery store (despite the fact that it's three blocks away), Google has been a huge help with the program that I know you all are familiar with and no doubt cherish deeply: Google Maps. Since 2009, this program has been top dog - beating out MapQuest once and for all.
 |
| Is Google losing it's crown? |
The almost universally used software for just about any business, park, or restaurant has been comprised of both satellite imagery and it's revolutionary 360 degree view of the terrain called StreetView. These stunning displays are updated by a fleet of over 1,000,000 vehicles patrolling most of North America, Asia, Europe, and most other big populaces.
However, there is a new player on the block: OpenStreetMap. This new map system, used now by Wikipedia, Foursquare, and other big companies, are using this new map system instead of Google maps because of both it's free usage (much like Wikipedia) and not having an API (Application Programming Interface), which is expensive for these companies to use. It is also crowd-sourced like Wikipedia in the sense that each entry in the map requires a source to reference it.
However, after using it myself and playing around with it, it's clear to note that aesthetically, OpenStreetMaps is much easier to use and navigate, despite not having a satellite function. It loads incredibly fast, and for those of us that have some map experience, incredible clarity and usability. It's also really user-friendly and definitely has taken my vote over Google Maps. And the benefit? If it isn't detailed enough for you, you can fix it!
Overall, despite the fact that this company is taking on maps as we know it, OpenStreetMaps is worth looking into for personal use. I recommend it.
No comments:
Post a Comment